
The following are examples of images of 4 and 5 story mixed-use buildings in Europe and Latin America. We’re using these as an example, because similar models in the US are typically built with larger streets in mind (for the automobile), which spaces them out farther, and leads to what you see in places that have attempted urbanism, but failed. Our point is that, given a better context with streets built more for people rather than cars, the buildings will not seem out of place or overbearing. In fact, they make the spaces they surround more desirable for people to gather:

An important point to note here is that we typically focus our efforts on architects, buildings, and zoning, and completely overlook the streets. The reality is, developers will build accommodating structures, that naturally fit the streets they sit beside. If you build an 8 lane road, you’ll get a Wal-Mart because the infrastructure allows for this. If you build a 2 or 4 lane road, you create a more organic, people friendly environment.

The last point to focus on is that we tend to build our infrastructure to help cars move faster
and more efficiently through areas. Congestion is deemed a bad thing. This only leads to sprawl, as we build the roads larger and spread the population farther out. Conversely, no one can imagine widening a street like McKinney Avenue into 6 lanes. It would tear the fiber of the area down, and the people friendly nature of the street would go away. Though the street is narrow, it still accommodates many cars, a trolley, and is dense with retail. We must begin focusing our efforts on the streets, and to not continue building the way we did beginning in the 1950′s. This was the era we removed our streetcars, created separate zoning, and broke apart our communities.

Now imagine all of these building being only 2 and 3 stories, with wide streets. The density would be gone, which would make the retailers leave, and you’d be left with a traditional car-centric suburb.

